Fragment reattachment in coronal fractures: Innovation, conservation and long-lasting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i5.48763Keywords:
Tooth fractures, Dentin adhesives, Conservative treatment.Abstract
The treatment of dental crown fractures has evolved with the introduction of minimally invasive techniques, with fragment reattachment being an effective alternative to restore both the function and aesthetics of the affected tooth. This approach, by preserving the original tooth structure, offers more natural and aesthetic results, especially in anterior teeth. However, the success of this procedure depends on a number of factors, including preservation of the fragment, adequate cavity preparation, the correct choice of adhesive materials and the reattachment technique used. In addition, the storage time of the fragment and adequate post-treatment management are crucial for the longevity of the treatment. This study seeks to explore these aspects, analyzing the reattachment techniques, the materials used and the clinical implications of the treatment of dental crown fractures. The literature highlights the importance of correct storage of fragments after trauma and the use of adhesion techniques that ensure the integrity of the restoration in the long term. In economic terms, reattachment presents itself as an affordable alternative compared to more invasive treatments, such as the fabrication of crowns. The analysis of the results showed that, when properly indicated and performed, reattaching offers an effective and low-cost solution for patients with crown fractures, maintaining dental aesthetics and occlusal function. The conclusion reinforces the relevance of this technique in the conservative treatment of dental fractures, highlighting the need for technical care and post-treatment follow-up for long-term success.
Downloads
References
Almeida, I. D. (2021). Metodologia do trabalho científico [recurso eletrônico]. Recife: Ed. UFPE. ISBN 978-65-5962-058-6 (online). https://repositorio.ufpe.br/bitstream/123456789/49435/1/METODOLOGIA%20DO%20TRABALHO%20CIENTÍFICO.pdf.
Arias, Z., Falú, H. L., Osorio, T., Claudia, P., Omori, K., Yamamoto, T., Nizami, M. Z. I., & Takashiba, S. (2023). Reattachment of fractured tooth fragment by multidisciplinary treatment approach. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 64(1), 13-22. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2022-0019.
Casarin, S. T. et al. (2020). Tipos de revisão de literatura: considerações das editoras do Journal of Nursing and Health. Journal of Nursing and Health. 10(5). https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/19924.
Cavalcante, L. T. C. & Oliveira, A. A. S. (2020). Métodos de revisão bibliográfica nos estudos científicos. Psicol. Rev. 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1678-9563.2020v26n1p82-100.
Jain, K., Goyal, L., & Agarwal, P. (2023). Crown fragment reattachment by the minimal intervention approach for coronal tooth fractures: A case series. Cureus. 15(11), e48710. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48710.
Khandelwal, P., Srinivasan, S., Arul, B., et al. (2023). Fragment reattachment after complicated crown-root fractures of anterior teeth: A systematic review. Dent Traumatol. 37(1), 37-52. doi: 10.1111/edt.12602.
Kaya, A., Hamza, B., Al-Haj Husain, N., Mätzener, K. J., & Özcan, M. (2023). Adhesion of tooth fragment after trauma: Effect of adhesion strategy and storage in the rescue box. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 48(2), 19-25. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.030.
Nagi, S. M., & Khadr, S. M. (2023). Influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment. Biomater Investig Dent. 8(1), 112-8. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2021.1952873. Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free e-book]. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM.
Poubel, D. L. N., Rezende, L. V. M. L., Almeida, J. C. F., Garcia, F. C. P., Toledo, I. P., Poi, W. R., & Guerra, E. N. S. (2018). Tooth fragment reattachment techniques: A systematic review. Dent Traumatol. 34(3), 135-43. doi: 10.1111/edt.12392.
Prodanov, C. C. & Freitas, E. C. (2013). mEtodologia do trabalho CiEntíFiCo: Métodos e Técnicas da Pesquisa e do Trabalho Acadêmico. (2ed.). Ed. Feevale. ISBN 978-85-7717-158-3.
https://www.feevale.br/Comum/ ídias/0163c988-1f5d-496f-b118-a6e009a7a2f9/E-book%20Metodologia%20do%20Trabalho%20Cientifico.pdf.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paul. Enferm. 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Caroline Tomasini Pascoal; Vitória Raiana Monteiro; Veronica Cristina Kuczmarski Gerhard; Jordana Bheatricy Viana; Maria Eduarda Oenning Zaniolo; Sarah Geller Lopes; Bruna Mabilly Dias; Julia Garda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
